patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices
Mike Lowry

We Can't Trust Elected Officials to Do the Right Thing

During last fall’s campaigns for both Roswell and Alpharetta City Council and mayor offices, every single candidate expressed opposition to the TSPLOST. Now that the vote nears and the governor and speaker are in full campaign mode to support it, these same candidates, now officeholders, are refusing to take a public position. 

One candidate, after representing her opposition as a candidate and her neutrality as an officeholder, was overheard at a private function urging everyone to vote for the TSPLOST.

It seems the lure of the honey pot of new tax money is incredibly strong.

It also seems that Brian Kemp, the Secretary of State, has joined the pro-TSPLOST campaign. Legally, the SOS has authority over ballot language and even though the specific language for the TSPLOST issue is specified in HB277 as:

( ) YES

 

( ) NO

 

 

Shall _______ County's transportation system and the transportation network in this region and the state be improved by providing for a 1 percent special district transportation sales and use tax for the purpose of transportation projects and programs for a period of ten years?'

SOS Kemp felt the need to insert the following preamble above the HB277-specified ballot language: 

“Provides for local transportation projects to create jobs and reduce traffic congestion with citizen oversight.”

I certainly wouldn’t question his right to do that under the law, but I can sure question his ethics in doing so. The claim that it creates jobs is very questionable and has been knocked down by Politifact. The claim that it reduces traffic congestion is ludicrous on its face. As for citizen oversight, a quick reading of HB277 leads one to understand that the Citizen Review Panel is a politically appointed body with no enforcement power and cannot review projects until they are completed. “Oversight” is nowhere in sight. 

Fellow citizens, I believe it’s time to send our elected officials at all levels a clear message that we expect them to work in our best interest, and to "do the right thing" once elected.

I hope you will join me in voting this monstrosity down.

Truthseeker

10:13 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012

Interesting Brandon Beach is actively on the board of GDOT while running for office. We all know just how dysfunctional GDOT is. He is publicly for the tax increase, boondoggle known as TSPLOST.

Chip Rogers, at least this time around, is against TSPLOST.

Please know your facts and vote accordingly.

Reply
Comment_arrow

I Love Sandy Springs

11:14 am on Friday, June 22, 2012

Thank you for the reminder about Brandon Beach being on the GDOT. If the other GDOT commissioners/board members are as unapproachable as Mr. Beach, then the citizens oversite will be a ruse. Mike Lowrey- you did not convince me to change my vote to no, but your forum did allow me to realize that oversite boards can be full of jackasses that are toadies of the board.

Comment_arrow

John

12:06 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

I still find Mr. Beach preferable to Chip Rogers. Though personally against it, at least he has not back-slid on his position with regard to the TSPLOST. He also has not back-slid on his support for local control of schools, my personal favorite.

Comment_arrow

David Fige

12:09 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

I was at a Candidates forum last night and heard Mr Beach. There is no need to worry of him being elected to be a Dog Catcher.. Lets just say he didn't impress the crowd on hand.

Comment_arrow

John

12:34 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

Well...better the dog catcher than the dog.

Comment_arrow

No Name

4:46 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

It's called voting for the lesser of the weevils. Advocating for TSPLOST while saying you are for low taxes is snort-worthy.

Why is he not made to resign from GDOT? Even if there is a legal loophole, it seems like he would care about the perception enough to do the right thing.

Comment_arrow

Brian Davis

12:38 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Chip was for the TSPLOST when the project list included a redo of the intersection at Red Bud Road and I-75, adjacent to his meth hotel.

He also led the effort to penalize local communities that did not pass the referendum, that was a Senate creation.

In reference to the District 21 Senate Race there is only one candidate who has voted for the TIA and its Chip Rogers who voted for it twice.

You might disagree with Brandon but he lets you know where he stands and will listen to you. Unlike Chip he has a job and can substanitate his income. He didn't write the TIA bill, in fact he and the DOT Board pushed the legislature to adopt a project list and put it in the bill that was designed by engineers, but the weak politicians punted.

Just Nasty and Mean

11:27 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012

Providing marketing and biased information on the ballot is patently illegal! I hope the general public figures out the elected elites are attempting to STEER them into voting for TSPLOST with coercion, lies and misinformation.

All those local officials that campaigned on being against TSPLOST,--and at the candidate forum I attended, 100% of them were AGAINST TSPLOST--- and now pretending to be neutral---we're watching! We see your temerity and lack of a spine to resist the lure of a pot of money.

Come time to vote---WE WILL REMEMBER!

Reply

MikeAlpharetta

1:11 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012

This is silly... No one trusts elected officials, all they do is cater to special interest, corporations and their future endeavors. That's why you should frequently vote them OUT!

Reply

Susan Stanton

1:33 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012

If I am not mistaken, Georgia has laws against electioneering near a polling place. The added verbiage appears to be electioneering on the ballot!

Shame on you, Brian Kemp.

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Fige

12:50 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

I voted for Brian Kemp, not next time... I can see Nov. from my house.. That Nov 2014 for him...

Lee at rootsinalpharetta.com

1:35 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012

Mike, I've enjoyed reading your coverage of T-SPLOST. Keep it up!

I think local officials are under enormous pressure from several fronts to either support T-SPLOST or keep their lips sealed. Peach Pundit covered a story in Lowndes County a few days ago about Gov Deal supporting local officials who endorse T-SPLOST. Back here at home, I doubt any city councilmen would publicly oppose T-SPLOST given the political and bureaucratic influence the GDOT board representative has here.

Reply

Bryan Farley

2:28 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012

Maybe they just see that doing nothing over and over and complaining about the same problem isn't the right thing to do. Maybe since this was an actual effort for the region to work as one -- like it should always do -- and since there was citizen input to create it maybe, just maybe they saw through the complainers and no voters. Maybe they learned that paying taxes is what we do to provider for ALL public services like police, fire, transit, and yes even roads since none can pay for themselves. Maybe some of the complainers can stop living in the 1960s and let Atlanta and the entire region become a world class one.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Lowry

3:50 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012

And maybe they just see that crossing the governor and doing what their citizens want will be difficult...
And maybe what has made Atlanta great already is that we have become a large network of clusters with a very desirable suburban lifestyle...
And maybe, just maybe, the "citizen input" wasn't really citizen input, but a carefully managed, delphi-technique appearance of citizen input...
And maybe the people who benefit from roads pay for them in gas taxes, unlike the people who ride transit...
And maybe the "progressive" lifestyle envisioned by the transit proponents isn't very appealing to very many of us...
And maybe the "denigrate and demean" style of Saul Alinsky isn't working very well in this debate.

Comment_arrow

Bryan Farley

4:33 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012

@ Mike Lowry
Well most citizens want relief from traffic. I guess sitting doing nothing is the answer. Atlanta is great but of ATLANTA! Not the cluster of suburbs that have created this sprawling mess who are also the main ones complaining about traffic. Citizen input is citizen input. Most of the input was to do something about traffic; not to sit and complain about a tax and let everything get worse. As far as your gas tax, roads are subsidized far more than just gas taxes and guess what I have driven on every street in the metro area. So some of my money has probably went to pay for a street in your area which is one I may never drive on. But some how paying for transit that you may never use is different? Maybe the progessive lifestyle isn't for the older people maybe it's for the new wave of young intelligent minds that we are trying to attract to this area that realize we aren't in 1950 and everything is life as far away from the city because we are scared of "crime." Wonder why condos are sprining up everywhere in the city and not more sub divisions. Hey I even take back the old people comment because there are plenty of older people who down size and realize an more walkable convenient lifestyle is better than wasting hours in the sprawl of your "clusters." Remember people moving here and businesses alike are attracted to the name ATLANTA, not one of the clusters you speak of and as goes ATLANTA the region will probably die first.

Truthseeker

3:49 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012

Bryan - maybe taxpayers are tired of being taxed to death and lied to. Do we need to look any further than the GA400 Toll. Taxpayers were promised the toll would end when the bonds were paid off. Did not happen, won't ever happen.
Taxpayers were promised the money raised by the toll would only go to maintaining/improving GA400. Then why was toll money spent buying land at Atlantic Station?
From the AJC
"In 2002 $10.4 million from Ga. 400 toll funds and bought 6.8 acre tract of land at Atlantic Station - a price that state officials determined was THREE times the land's appraised value. That parcel of land still sits vacant today at Atlantic Station."
"A state inspector general's report released in April 2003 showed that GDOT paid $6.7 million too much for the property. ("$10 million in tolls for $3 million land - Inspector suggests Ga. 400 revenue misused," AJC, 4-22-2003). The IG called the purchase a "questionable use of state funds without documented due diligence." A Georgia Department of Transportation appraisal THREE MONTHS before the purchase placed the value of the land at $3.7 million.

Why are Fulton and DeKalb already paying a 1% tax for MARTA?
AND now we're being asked to vote an additional 1% tax for projects that include the maintenance of MARTA.
Are your really that naive? Please do some research and see what an absolute boondoggle this is. TSPLOST itself says it will do nothing to improve traffic.

Reply
Comment_arrow

No Name

9:19 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012

Here is the actual quote:

ARC’s Mike Alexander has publicly admitted, “The average commute time really doesn’t change a lot.” Because of this admission, ARC has changed their definition of alleviating traffic congestion to “increasing the hypothetical number of people who can reach a given point within 45 minutes” which has nothing to do with commute times.

Bryan Farley

4:38 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012

@Truthseeker

Sorry I've done my research and it has concluded me to say YES and not continue to be stuck in traffic. There are far to many road projects of widening in the 'burbs for me, you, or anyone to believe it will do nothing. As for transit we need more options to move around the cities denser areas (downtown, midtown, buckhead) versus to have to drive everywhere. The argument is that the metro region isn't dense enough; well those 3 areas are and having walkable and pro transit options is a great way to move people in those areas.

Reply

Bryan Farley

4:45 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012

As far as the not dense enough argument there are plenty of people in the main 5 to support transit. DC has already shown that it works. Small pockets of density around the stations that bring in business and walkable living space next to the station while still giving the option for those who want that "burb life" to have the option to commute into the city by car or rail and not make the interstates into parking lots. But once they get into the city how will they get around? Oh yeah the light rail and street car and beefed up, more frequent bus system that will be there with the tax. And though I don't like taxes ATL should pay more because it's more to pay for. Welcome to living in a big city. But once the burb lovers see how positive supporting roads AND transit will by they will be paying the MARTA tax as well and then we can all pay just ONE tax for ONE region! Get it together Conservs and Tea'ers

Reply
Comment_arrow

Truthseeker

7:15 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012

You state "DC has already shown how it works". A quick search finds DC in the top 10 worst cities for traffic - the following quote about DC traffic
"Getting anything accomplished in Congress can often take a long, long time. Maybe it's because just getting to Congress can take a long, long time. Commuters in the D.C. area waste the second most amount of time sitting in their cars."

I know you want to ignore the question regarding the double taxation for Fulton and DeKalb county so I'll ask again why would we vote to DOUBLE pay?
If you really did your own research you would understand that even the TSPLOST people are saying it won't improve traffic.

Please stop with the immature name calling and stick to facts to present your case. So far you're not doing too well in that category.

Comment_arrow

Bryan Farley

9:55 am on Friday, June 22, 2012

@ Truthseeker 7:15 on June 21

I found your nice DC quote: http://www.weather.com/activities/driving/slideshow/traffic.html

That's great but that's part of being in a big metro area. Does that mean we sit and do nothing just because we have traffic issues? That's what I hear from all the people that say no.

As far as double paying we can't make them pay for MARTA if they don't want MARTA. I would love for the burbs to get on the boat and pony up the penny. It would benefit them to have better bus service and new MARTA rail service. The point is that it is two complete separate types of taxes. That's part of living in a big city. More things have to be paid for than in the burbs.

And sorry if you are so sensative. I guess I can't abbreviate. So instead of saying Libs we'll say Liberal. No conservs; conservatives. And no Tea'ers but Tea Party Members. Feel better?

Comment_arrow

Bryan Farley

10:02 am on Friday, June 22, 2012

And on the issue of improving traffic, I guess the no voters want a plan that is going to all of the sudden take 20 and 30 minutes off of your commute and all highways will be clear at all hours of the day? I guess you don't realize that it would cost over 60 billion to even come close. So I guess we should do a 100 year tax since we are only bring in about 6 billion every ten years? Oh wait what about the extra 3 million that are suppose to be moving to the area in the next 10-20 years? I guess we'll just pay for double decker highways that are 14 lanes on each level. That should help right. Forget transit; oh wait.... you all don't like to be taxed! LOL I guess they should figure out a way to pay for it themselves huh? Or a way that it can make a profit huh?

Bryan Farley

4:51 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012

Finally, since y'all want to complain about the people you vote... STOP VOTING THEM IN!! Looks like the same conservative republicans keep getting voted in doing the same mess all the time. Then you'll complain. But I guess that is better than voting democrate huh?

Reply
Comment_arrow

No Name

9:16 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012

Haven't agreed with anything you've said but agreeing with you here. All the GA pols are "conservative republicans" in name only -- there is nothing "conserve"-ative about them.

Comment_arrow

Mike Lowry

1:20 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

I supported Brian's campaign, know him personally and considered him a good choice at the time. His actions on this issue are a gross misuse of his powers as SOS and an insult to those who supported him.

If this were a choice between individual candidates Bob Hatcher and Barry Crenshaw instead of a yes/no tax issue, it would be the same as adding a preamble on the ballot that said "Candidate Bob Hatcher is a great guy, family man and supports the homeless" and being silent on his opposition.

Lee Fleck

9:18 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012

Mike,
Keep pressing. I believe your efforts will be successful.
Every electronic billboard that is promoting a “yes” vote that I drive by on my daily round trip commute to the airport infuriates me to no end. The amount of money that GDOT is spending with such advertising is a perfect example of just how wasteful that organization is with our money!
Roswell has been funding MARTA for years, so what does MARTA do? They discontinue bus service to East Roswell requiring all the construction at the Holcomb Bridge & 400 interchange. Roswell citizens had to pay for all that construction expense & we were subject to months of disruption to traffic last year. And what organization do you think will be the primary recipient of the T-SPLOT revenues?
The GA 400 toll fiasco is evidence in and of itself. We Can't Trust Elected Officials to Do the Right Thing – your statement is an absolute truism.
Lee Fleck

Reply
Comment_arrow

No Name

9:25 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012

"The amount of money that GDOT is spending with such advertising is a perfect example of just how wasteful that organization is with our money! "

You got it..... using taxpayer money to run a campaign to tax us more!

Guy Bailey

9:12 am on Friday, June 22, 2012

Vote Yes on SPLOST and drag Cherokee into the 21st Century

Reply
Comment_arrow

Phil McCall

9:44 am on Friday, June 22, 2012

Mr. Bailey - A vote of yes to T-SPLOST will indeed drag Cherokee County taxpayers and drivers further into government debt as the 21st Century to date has shown. Govt. debt and spending in the 20th & 21st Century is nothing I want to perpetuate. The tax you advocate will be extracted on a Federal, State, and local level with 52% being spent within Atlanta. I'd prefer to spend my tax dollars on keeping teachers in CCSD class rooms and improving our graduation rates rather than trust GDOT or a politically appointed 'citizen group' to be the fall guys when the projects run over budget.

I'll vote no and urge the legislature to revisit to form a task force to fund solutions to traffic, and not political solutions that T-SPLOST became.

David Fige

9:34 am on Friday, June 22, 2012

I'm Voting "NO and I live in Cherokee County. a huge chunk of the funds are going to a system that only 5% of metro Atlanta uses "MARTA". We in Cherokee County are a Donor County and we know how well the City of Atlanta a "HUGE Recipient" Member are good steward of tax dollars NOT.. I would rather Cherokee fund the two projects on the list a different way.

Reply

Phil McCall

9:48 am on Friday, June 22, 2012

David - Little River Bridge replacement was on an existing GDOT list, and was moved over to T-SPLOST funding. If we reject T-SPLOST the bridge should go back on the GDOT list. I know of no funding plans to widen Hwy 140 other than T-SPLOST.

Reply

Emil

10:06 am on Friday, June 22, 2012

After we defeat the current T-Splost bandaid, a Plan B might include more emphasis on Public Transport.
"If we’d spent as much federal stimulus money on public transportation as we spent on highways, we would have created twice as much work and put a bigger dent in the unemployment rate.

That’s the analysis of stimulus spending by Smart Growth America, the Center for Neighborhood Technology and U.S. PIRG, the public-policy lobbying group. Smart Growth America found that every billion dollars spent on public transportation produced 16,419 job-months, while the same amount spent on highway infrastructure projects produced 8,781 job-months."

In Oregon, property values near transit stations rose up to 20 percent, according to Oregon Metro.

Reply
Comment_arrow

No Name

10:41 am on Friday, June 22, 2012

Oregon property values rise because of the artificial reduced supply caused by their stupid urban growth boundary. People have to pay more for places they don't want simply b/c there is not enough choice. Congestion is horrible because of these inane policies and so of course those closest to transit go up in price. That doesn't make it a desirable place to live and it certainly wasn't created by free market forces.

Government-created jobs: many are temporary in nature and they all require taking money from actual producers. How does that help the economy or unemployment rate? You may get a temporary bounce but the long-term effects of this actually worsen private sector unemployment.

David Fige

10:08 am on Friday, June 22, 2012

Phil I don't have an issue about T-SPLOST in General, just being part of a 10 county plan Where Cherokee County dollars are used to Subsidized a Failed MARTA system that's a huge drain on the Tax Payers of Atlanta, Fulton, and Dekalb Counties. That's a Hard sell to people who will never benefit from MARTA. If the GDOT has so limited funding why are they funding all this pro T-SPLOST Ad's? Being a Good Steward of Tax Payers Money is first and foremost my concern.Those "Recipient" Counties and The City of Atlanta has shown that there not capable of doing that...

Reply

Bryan Farley

10:41 am on Friday, June 22, 2012

@David Fige

I hate the argument that only a small percentage use MARTA because it's a stupid argument. How can you expect MARTA to serve the entire metro area when out of 28 counties (even if you look at the 10 county area or even the big 5 couties) MARTA only serves 2 counties and is only funded by 2 counties? MARTA has about 500,000 riders a day. In an area of about 6 million that's still 8% in the total 28 county area which is amazing being that it only serves 7% of the metro region, as far as number of counties versus those served. But MARTA has 500,000 riders in an area with about 2 million within Fulton and Dekalb; THAT'S 25% OF ITS SERVICE AREA RIDES MARTA!!!! Heck, we can even split that in half under the assumption that 500,000 are rides to and from. That's 250,000 in a service zone of 2 million; that is still about 12 to 13 percent! And if you add all the tansit providers currently in service it still adds up to about 12% of rides are on transit. Those are great numbers compared to some cities, especially when most of the burbs don't even support transit at all.

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Fige

1:02 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

On MARTA own website they give a figure of 240,000 rider figures... so your math doesn't add up.. With more then Half of the funding going to MARTA, How is that going to help the people in the other 8 county's? It's not going to help at all.. just more good money the new "Regional" government has taken and wasted ... Lets see, We have Federal Taxes, State Taxes, City and County taxes, and Now a Regional Tax... So do we get to vote for those running this project? NO .

Comment_arrow

Mike Lowry

1:14 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

Yes, but we are paying $12.50 for each trip, or $25 per day for these riders. This is not a cost-effective solution, and couldn't survive without the rest of both counties and the federal government (that's the rest of the country) artificially propping it up.

Comment_arrow

Bryan Farley

11:48 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

@David Fige 1:02pm on June 22

"That's 250,000 in a service zone of 2 million; that is still about 12 to 13 percent!"

Please do your math and stop including people out of Fulton/Dekalb counties. MARTA by law is only able to serve 2 counties so why do you and everyone else try to include the entire region in your figures? That's like saying that MTA in New York serves the entire state of NY and you use the entire population to get your figures when it only serves the NYC area. If MARTA was allow to serve the 6 million in the region and only had 240,000 one way riders then I would completely agree. But it only serves 2 million so the other 4ish million don't count.

JC Resident

11:33 am on Friday, June 22, 2012

For some real numbers check cleanaircampaign.org and run the commute calculator. The average price of gas is $3.30/gallon if you drive, if you take transit, it's 16 cents per gallon. With every rotation of your car's engine, you are getting closer to a costly maintenance payment involving your tires, belts, battery, oil, transmission fluid, radiator fluid, points, plugs, shocks, bearings, rings, gaskets, brake shoes, ... I read on here about people not trusting politicians. Does this mean you trust your mechanic? The auto dealerships? Exxon, Mobile, BP, Valero? The car companies that left the vacant, blighted acreage on the north and south ends of MARTA? (which is still operating, despite claims that it has "failed" on here).

According to the Atlanta Book of Lists, there are about 4 million residents in the Metro area and 93% of those residents commute alone daily to work. Assuming 1 million people commute to Atlanta alone every day in 4 passenger cars, that equates to about 3 million empty car seats every day! For the price most commuters pay to park in a month, they could have taken transit for 6 months. And people complain about a 1% sales tax to try and fix this problem? It will cost more to idle at a red light for 2 minutes!

This isn't a referendum that should need "selling." Anybody who can do basic math should realize the economic benefits of transit for both the community and the individual.

Reply

David Fige

12:04 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

It's a simple question , What will this list of MARTA projects do to help the traffic in Cherokee County? NOTHING . I moved to Cherokee because because of for the most part our city and county government has been good steward of our tax dollars. I don't know one person I've talk to in Cherokee that will vote "Yes". It's kinda like getting the Hard sell at a car lot, and people just push back... I can go on forever on examples of the City of Atlanta not being a good steward of there tax dollars. Atlanta Public school is an example, besides the Airport . one former Mayor when to prison and the last one was sued over an Airport Advertising contact and it cost the city Millions ... then the current mayor has his own issue with Airport projects that don't pass the smell test ...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bryan Farley

12:58 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

what does Atlanta get for paying for your roads? Nothing. What does Cherokee get from even being included in the metro Atlanta region? Everything. Job, economy, all the nice suburban lifestyles Cherokee folks get to live all while still enjoying the amenities of the big city right at hand. I say you'll should pay to come into to Fulton and Dekalb. This way you can stay away from our economy, the jobs that come to this area for Atlanta, not Cherokee county. We would still be 2 million strong. Matter fact stop taking the money that is generated by the Atlanta area and using it on your suburban roads. Pay for your own roads with your own county's money.

David Fige

1:12 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

Bryan, Atlanta is a Recipient and Cherokee is a donor..It's simple we put in to the GDOT, School system more then we get back. So I would just Love to get 100% of our Tax Dollars back. We pay sale taxes when we travel and buy anything in Atlanta right? That what a consumption taxes are all about, those who used the services pay and those whom don't don't... I just don't want to subsidize the failures of the City of Atlanta Period !!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bryan Farley

2:56 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

Are you kidding me?! Man that was a laugh. I guess that's why we are in the metro Cherokee county area... right? There is nothing in Cherokee county. The stuff you have out there is so that you can mooch off ATL then go back to your nest out there in Cherokee. You use and help clog and destroy our streets, come to our entertainment functions, see our professional teams play, and enjoy everything else ATL has to offer but don't want to have nothing to do with helping to maintain it. Then complain about ATL. Only 2 million actually help maintain the 2 big counties. The other 4 million contribute to what I described above. I shouldn't say that either but most of the other 4 million do. And you are one of them. I bet you don't even work in Cherokee. Chances are you do work in Fulton or Dekalb. LOL.. I bet you work downtown and have a nice job don't you? Typical example.

Frank Jones

1:40 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

IMO, the issue isn't about roads and public transportation as we need more roads, more lanes and additional public transportation option. Instead, it is about the funding of the improvements.

Basically, the legislature wants a NEW funding source call "T-Splost" when it already has funding sources in the form of Gas Tax and Income Tax. These existing taxes could be used to tax the population equibly and have all beneficiaries of transportation improvements pay. Instead, the legislature is using DURESS to FORCE us to vote for the ONE OPTION they've provided us...T-Splost! They're all too weak-kneed to do their jobs and by their ploy "Vote for T-Splost, or Else!" are in effect terrorizing us. To borrow a phrase from Reagan, "we won't negotiate with terrorists!" I for one will be voting NO!

For all of you voting YES, please keep in mind that the Atlanta region (as the main population center and economic driver for the state) has built & funded the roads for the entire state. And while we vote "YES" for T-splost, most if not all of the other regions will be voting NO as their roads aren't bad. Now that we've funded their roads and we need money for our transportation, the rest of the state won't have to help! And the last I checked, citizens of every county will benefit directly or indirectly from our traffic improvements...IMO they should help pay!

Vote NO on T-Splost.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bryan Farley

3:02 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

I completely agree it is a funding issue but what you are saying is to use the gas or income tax (something the state of Georgia will never do because they are more focused on roads) versus paying for our own improvements. What I'm hearing is say no to fixing our problems and probably still pay for most of Georgias and just continue to pay for Georgias while we deteriorate. And why would any politition campaign how they are going to use the gas tax or income tax for something else knowing most of the people aren't going to vote for them. What they do is vote for the "conservatives" that keep going in doing the same thing that they are complaining about.

David Fige

3:31 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

The issue for me is Trust... GA 400, the 911 phone tax, School taxes we pay. The funds get diverted for "other" uses.. I hear some people on the board that say what people want to hear, and not being straight up.. The hear someone from ARC that say this will have little if any effect on Traffic. The why spend 6-8 Billion tax Dollars on these project? To create Jobs? That sounds like the many Trillion Dollar Stimulus Plan the President put forth, How did that work out? We did get the Chevy Volt right. A car no one wants and even when we tax payers are Subsidizing each car many thousands of dollars each. If you don't like paying Big city taxes like Atlanta has you move to where they don't. I did, and I want to keep it that way.

Reply

Bryan Farley

4:01 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

I say for all the "no" tax folks fine. Lets get rid of all the taxes we pay. No GA 400 tax, school taxes, no tsplost... nothing. We will just all pay for what we use when we use it. So when you need the fire department YOU pay for it yourself. When you want to use a highway or street then you pay for it. Watch how our society as a whole crumbles. No one wants the taxes but wants the service. Folks don't want big city taxes or to help the big city but want the big city jobs and big city money and big city amenities. You want to go use it up and then when the city is crumbling you say "the big city is mis-managed." Maybe it's cause the big city of 500,000 has to provide services for 6 million or a 500,000 budget.

Reply

David Fige

4:26 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

Bryan your right, we don't want to give 500 Million to build a new Stadium for a private company, when the stadium they are currently in isn't even pay for yet.Funny I don't remember the City of Atlanta fire coming up here to put out 1 fire. We have Great fire services and Our Sheriff dept. is Certified so it's in the top 3% nation wide. Our Standards are alot higher. Just look at the Airport Contract that were rebid due to the Mayors friends didn't win any of them ? Were corruption is the norm in Atlanta, it's the exception here.. I guess you don't understand We are a Donor County unlike the City of Atlanta were for every 1$ they collect they receive 2.4$ back.. So I would understand why you would want to keep the Status Quo... By the way How about that School system, that should make you really proud being the Joke of Georgia... Why are people keep moving out of the city? I watching the news every night to see how many got murdered....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bryan Farley

5:00 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

You don't have to pay for the stadium. Just make sure you don't come check out any of the games or drive on our streets. And of course your Sheriff office is top notch and your fire services are great. Your county never uses them. The occasional field fire or the few burb kids that want to be hardcore. Corruption is everywhere it just not as known because it doesn't affect as many people there. And to be a DONOR COUNTY you would have to be the head. The one with the money and you aren't. Cherokee is just a piece of the body. Atlanta and Fulton are the head. And if you think ATL gets more back than they dish then you really need to do some education in yourself. For every dollar we give we get back 50 cent and you folks from the burbs use another 25 cent by coming in and using our services and not paying. Take a look at our skylines (plural) and see how great ATL is. What's in Cherokee?

Comment_arrow

No Name

5:07 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

Hmmm, if you aren't getting back the money you pay in, and neither are we, then where is it all going? Two guesses. First one doesn't count.

Phil McCall

5:43 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

Dear Bryan - My skylines are the foothills of the Appalachians. As far as 'using' your services...fine, we don't; nothing in Atlanta that we need or desire. It may shock you, but we don't need Atlanta. So help yourself to all the taxation you desire for yourself; just leave us alone. Life is full of choices and responsibility; we made our choice. Good luck; write from time to time to let us know how that city thing is working out for you as it reminds us what a good choice we made.

Reply
Comment_arrow

No Name

5:59 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

Ditto. Had to go downtown for something today and husband was musing that we need to move northward and be done with Fulton County. We don't need or use anything down that way, in fact, avoid it.

There is a place for people who enjoy the urban life. Good for them. Now if they could leave those of us alone who prefer to live a different way.

Comment_arrow

Rob Johnson

5:53 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Very well said Phil.

Mr. Farley - There's a lot in Cherokee - There's also a lot in Atlanta and we would like it to stay that way thank you.

Comment_arrow

Bryan Farley

11:55 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Dear Phil - My skylines are downtown, midtown, Buckhead, Atlantic Station, the Perimeter, and up and down Peachtree. Just make sure you stay out there. Make sure your county residents stop coming intown and taking our big paying jobs and then going back out to the country. Make sure the GRTA buses and your cars don't ruin our streets that we have to pay for while the residents of the TRUE metro area generate millions for the state to fix yours. Thanks for the luck as well. I'll let you know as our skylines grow, our city becomes bigger, our star power rises, more companies come with better jobs, and more people will choose the city life versus the "white flight" that got us in this mess in the first place.

ACC-SEC Booster

6:17 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

Mike Lowry
1:14 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

"Yes, but we are paying $12.50 for each trip, or $25 per day for these riders. This is not a cost-effective solution, and couldn't survive without the rest of both counties and the federal government (that's the rest of the country) artificially propping it up."

That's the thing, that $12.50 per trip that it costs to fund the operation of transit systems like MARTA should be paid for by the users of that transportation infrastructure (the riders/passengers) and public-private partnerships.

If a transit infrastructure cannot be self-sufficient then it does not need to be operational in this understandably anti-tax, anti-government political climate.

Like transit, roads can also be and should be made to be self-sufficient and self-funding by abolishing the state gas tax on all Georgian citizens (while keeping the gas tax in place and raising it on all out-of-state road users) and levying distance-based user fees on all Georgian vehicles (the more one uses the road network, the more one pays; the less one uses the road network, the less one pays).

Reply

ACC-SEC Booster

6:26 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

Mike Lowry
1:14 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

Making each major individual piece of transportation infrastructure self-sufficient and self-funding guarantees a virtually endless source of funding for our transportation infrastructure as the costs of initial construction and continued operation and maintenance of each particular major road or individual transit line is paid for with each individual use by each individual motorist or transit user, unlike the very-limited revenues from the gas tax for roads and the sales tax for transit.

This T-SPLOST is basically designed to run short on the added transportation infrastructure that the tax is proposed to build, especially on the transit infrastructure that the tax is proposed to very-partially fund the building of.

Reply

Dean Sheridan

9:29 am on Saturday, June 23, 2012

It's DeJa vu (i.e. the Federal Stimulus) in many ways but in a right to work State these Unions will go "unnamed." Hey , I'm just talking straight. As a society if we keep doing things this way we all deserve what we get.
Maybe it's the best they can do based on an imperfect World in the current political system; in their defense during an election year - we can only guess.
The facts are clear : Only 47% of the project list is for roads & bridges. It does open the door to Unfunded mandates. it is very expensive.MARTA is involved and they currently have a 489 million budget short fall. It is being sold on false false premises. We are not getting the value we should. We can do better; much better.

Reply

David Fige

2:30 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

@Bryan Farley,
Commuters pay into Atlanta's tax base, as commercial property is taxes at a higher rate then residential. So you should Thank the commuters who come into Atlanta then leaves and don't use your schools, hospitals, city parks.. and on and on... The last I seen was Commercial paid about 25-30 % more per $ of property Values, than residential Tax Payers....

Reply

Bryan Farley

3:17 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

@ David Fige
You are right commuter definitely pay into the tax base but here's the problem. The metro area still generate far more than half of the taxes for the entire state yet receives well less than 40% of that money back. So what good is it to have a commuter come in and destroy the city streets and overall infrastructure then go back to the burbs where their money and the people that pay for the city get more of it in areas that are not going to need the improvements that ATL needs? It's still the same concept: commuters come in mess up the city then go back and wait for the money for their 4 lane with a grassy median perfectly paved roads while ATL struggles and suffers at the hands of them. Then you hear how "wasteful the city is" because it handles the entire metro area. While the burbs don't see no where near as much traffie as the city does, other than on the main interstates bringing you into the city.

Reply

Declaring Independence

9:49 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Georgia and the Atlanta Metro area are in danger of becoming a high tax state and area. Our employment base is already suffering and adding more taxes on the citizens will not help the situation. Our overall sales tax rates are approaching those of other states that have no or very little income and other taxes. Of course Fulton County also wants to raise the millage rate to make up for lost revenue due to lower property valuations.

Georgia is going to get its clock cleaned by other states that actually encourage business growth. People have choices now and will move out of the state, along with their salaries, to states with lower taxes and a more robust economy.

We need to vote against and oppose all tax increases in Georgia. I just wish we could revisit eSPLOST.

Reply

Paula

11:13 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

I like this from Warren Buffet:
Congressional Reform Act of 2012
1. No Tenure / No Pension.
A Congressman/woman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they're out of office.
2. Congress (past, present & future) participates in Social Security.All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, and Congress participates with the American people. It may not be used for any other purpose.
3. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all Americans do.
4. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.
5. Congress loses their current health care system and participates in the same health care system as the American people.
6. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American people.
7. All contracts with past and present Congressmen/women are void effective 12/1/12. The American people did not make this contract with Congressmen/women.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Truthseeker

12:18 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012

Quote from Larry "Seems odd that the people most dissatisfied with the Constitution are those who profess to love it the very mostest and who often get dressed up as 'Patriots' to emphasize their support of its original intent."

Wow, one sentence, really? The very "mostest"?
Your elementary school English teacher must have had union tenure.

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.
Abraham Lincoln

Any further commenting by you has now been delegated to fool status. Thanks for the laugh.

David Fige

9:12 am on Sunday, July 1, 2012

Larry, like how some think the 14th amendment that dealt with citizenship for Slaves, also covers Illegals Aliens whom invaded, broke our immigration laws, but are rewarded with citizenship for there offspring born here. Also though a presidential order that is bought here illegally get the same reward. Our founding father must be rolling over in there graves. The Constitution was to Limit Government , not it the rights of it's Citizens.....

Reply

David Fige

2:01 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012

Treat them the same as Diplomats whom has children born in the US, they get certificate of Birth, but not a Citizenship... You can not Reward illegal behavioral..

Reply

Phil McCall

9:43 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012

Dear Bryan - Our skyline in CC was again beautiful at sunup and at sundown. The robberies, shootings, and general crime of Atlanta contributes greatly to assisting you keeping us off your streets and out of your businesses. Your streets should do you just fine without us, or our T-SPLOST vote. Again, write from time to time and let us know how that city thing is working out for you.

Reply

Bryan Farley

10:47 am on Monday, July 2, 2012

Phil, our tall, steel structures of success also looked beautiful lit in the Atlanta night sky. And like all major cities, there is unfortunately crime within. But it's funny because most of the crime in the metro region actually happens outside city limits (i.e. Gwinnett, Clayton, and Cobb), without MARTA may I add. But it's ok, glad you enjoy your 'burb life. I'm sure the 200,000 or so residents won't make that much of a big deal when voting for the T-SPLOST in an area of about 4.5 million.

Reply

David Fige

10:59 am on Monday, July 2, 2012

Bryan, We must be living in a different world. The News I hear is another shooting in SW Atlanta. or SE Atlanta nightly..... Crime, Corruption, and high tax rates. Your Welcome to keep them all. As new building is starting to come back to Cherokee Country from people exiting Atlanta...

Reply

Bryan Farley

11:09 am on Monday, July 2, 2012

David, we must be. To say there isn't any crime in the city and that shootings don't happen would be a complete lie. But to say that all the crime in the metro area happens in ATL, completely untrue.

As far as construction please inform me as I don't go to Cherokee. Nothing out there to go to.

And you may want to get your facts correct because more people are moving back to the city, for many reasons. One being traffic and spending more time with family versus in your car surrounded by thousands of other people in cars you don't know.

http://atlanta.curbed.com/archives/2012/06/28/httponlinewsjcomarticlesb10001424052702304830704577493032619987956html.php

And they got their information from the Wall Street Journal, here is the link for that as well

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304830704577493032619987956.html

Oh how I enjoy progress!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rico

12:28 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

Good points but. I and many others feel that Cherokee Citizens are looked upon as less important. Case in point, 400 has a gazillion lanes that for the most part were paid for by tax dollar$, not toll dollar$. For over twenty years we have begged for at least one more lane on 575 from Sixes down. Now the only way we can get it is a TOLL ROAD? You say there is nothing to go to here. As compared to what other similar community in the USA? A ride down Riverstone, Townlake or Hwy 92 would be a good day trip.

Bryan Farley

1:31 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

@ Rico

Here's the deal with the "less important" thing. Services and money are going to go where the population is. Lets be real, if we have 1 million bucks to split between Cherokee (pop. about 200,000) and Fulton (pop. about 1,000,000) why would anyone divide the money up 50/50 when there is such a big difference in the amount of services each area needs?

The Ga 400 toll money was actually used to pay off the bonds that were used to construct the road itself. As far as toll roads I'm not a big fan either but what they do is produce money for maintaining roads. Understand we are in a major metropolitan area. What kills me about the burbs (mainly Cobb and Gwinnett) is that they try to be so separate from ATL but the reason that they have the population and the imenities they do is because of how close they are to ATL. Some people just aren't going to live in the city. But they want the things that come with being near a big city. But if you don't take care of the core (which is ATL) how do you expect the ends to survive? If ATL goes down in a blaze like most in the burbs want what do they think are going to happen to the economies there? You think companies are going to keep moving here and build downtowns all around the burbs? No! This goes for Cherokee too, when ATL fails the entire region fails and for that matter the entire state.

Reply

ACC-SEC Booster

1:38 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

Rico
12:28 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

In a way you are correct that Cherokee County and the I-575 Corridor, individually, is looked upon as less important than the GA 400 Corridor.
State politicians see the conservative Republican-dominated GA 400 Corridor (which includes Buckhead, Sandy Springs, Alpharetta, Roswell, Johns Creek, Milton, Forsyth County and the westside of Lake Lanier) as having more voting strength and political power than Cherokee County individually, which is seen as part of a package deal with Cobb and Paulding counties in the GOP primaries that decide statewide elections in Georgia.

Reply

ACC-SEC Booster

2:11 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

Rico
12:28 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

I-575 should have been widened to 6-8 through lanes years ago from the I-75 split up to the Riverstone Parkway interchange in Canton and likely would have been under a competent and coherent governing structure at the state level, which hasn't been seen in this state since the days when Zell Miller was Governor.
And, Rico, you are wrong about I-575 getting a toll road as it is only ONE reversible TOLL LANE that is tentatively proposed to be added to I-575 between I-75 and Sixes Road.
The reason(s) why one reversible toll lane is the only expansion that the I-575 Corridor is likely to get is because our inept state government, by way of the highly-dysfunctional Georgia Department of Transportation, has stated in no uncertain terms that they are not going to add anymore untolled lanes to Interstates and freeways in the Atlanta Region due to intensifying political and social pressure from an increasingly-powerful anti-road establishment and an already politically-powerful real estate development establishment to expand the region's ridiculously-meager rail transit offerings to compete with competing cities like Charlotte and, especially, Dallas as land spectulators and real estate developers view rail transit as being infinitely more of a driving force of real estate investment than roads in the 21st Century.

Reply

ACC-SEC Booster

2:32 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

The plan by the political and business establishment in North Georgia is to expand the road network in the region as little as possible so as to eventually motivate Metro Atlantans and North Georgians stuck in gridlock to get out of their cars and ride proposed network of future rail transit lines that are planned to crisscross North Georgia mainly by way of the region's network of existing freight rail lines (like the CSX-W&A freight rail corridor that runs parallel to I-75 into Northwest Georgia through Cobb County and the existing Georgia Northeastern Railroad line that runs parallel to I-575 into the North Georgia Mountains through Cherokee County) and a few selected busy surface streets (like Peachtree St; Roswell Rd in Buckhead, Sandy Springs & North Fulton; Buford Hwy in DeKalb and, of course, Cobb Parkway which might work much better as a super-arterial with untolled local lanes and tolled express lanes between the I-75 interchange in Northwest Atlanta and the Red Top Mountain area just south of Cartersville in Bartow County).
Here are a couple of links that might give some insight into the type of comprehensive rail transit plan that the political and business powers-that-be are pushing this area towards eventually:
http://www.dot.state.ga.us/travelingingeorgia/rail/Documents/CommuterRailMap.pdf
http://www.dot.state.ga.us/maps/Documents/railroad/nga_passenger.pdf

Reply

ACC-SEC Booster

2:56 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

The irony is that the rejection of this increasingly-unpopular T-SPLOST referendum by politically and socially-polarized Metro Atlanta voters (conservative OTP suburbanites and exurbanites vs. liberal ITP urbanites) will likely push the region even closer to being a rail transit-heavy region along the lines of a Northeastern/Northern city like a Washington DC, Chicago, Toronto (all three of which, by way have infinitely-better road networks than severely road infrastructure-challenged Atlanta) New York or Boston as, even though the proposed Atlanta Region T-SPLOST is severely-flawed, its rejection will cause already-scarce roadbuilding funds to be even more severely-scarce because the legislature built a poison pill into the T-SPLOST legislature that will penalize any region who votes rejects the T-SPLOST by requiring local governments within that region to pay 30% of the cost of state-funded roadbuilding projects instead of only the 10% that is paid now, meaning that all state-funded roadbuilding projects will triple in cost for local governments.

Reply

David Fige

7:16 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

That is one of the Biggest problem that like the health care law, either you play and go along with this majorly flawed mega Billion Dollar plan or your going to get "Taxed" The SCOUS already said the States can't be penalized( cutting medicaid funding), so don't you thing now the president has been set, that wouldn't be challenged too ? When you put a penalty in a tax law you just opened a can of worms that doesn't cut it any longer...

Reply
Comment_arrow

JC Resident

9:39 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012

It's hard to argue with it because it makes assumptions, is fraught with misspellings, and is generally nonsensical.
-- "majorly flawed" - just how? It can only be assumed that you are not on VA, medicare, or medicaid, and love HCA, Humana, BCBS, State Farm, or your company plan that gives your company far more tax breaks than you receive in benefits.
-- "go along ... or your going to get taxed" It's "you're" or "you are" and either you left off the period after "Taxed" or you wrote a run-on sentence where the meaninglessness is only outweighed by your cluelessness.
-- "SCOUS" - if you are referring to the supreme court, it is SCOTUS.
-- "already said the States can't be penalized( cutting medicaid funding)" Cite case, and please explain if "cutting medicaid funding" is or is not penalizing the states, and if so, how.
-- I do not "thing" the "president" has been set. I THINK you might mean "precedent," but it's hard to tell.
-- "When you put a penalty in a tax law... can of worms ... doesn't cut it" --- congratulations! you have possibly written the silliest statement about taxation that I have ever read!

It appears David Fige has lost a lot of brain cells from inhaling carbon monoxide while sitting in metro Atlanta gridlock. Help protect Mr. Fige's brain from further CO damage! Vote YES for HB277.

Truthseeker

2:57 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Larry Welsh,
Or should I call you Mr. Mostest ? For people to post you should've actually passed 4th grade spelling and grammar. Perhaps people will be embarrassed at their ignorance. Notice I did not say stupidity. You can fix ignorance with knowledge. You can't fix stupid.

It's kind of like believing in a corrupt and incompetent GDOT and voting yourself a tax increase. A tax increase that will do nothing to improve traffic. Like people who have amnesia when it comes to promises made to taxpayers about the GA400 tolls coming down. Or the fact that Fulton County/DeKalb County will be paying for MARTA maintenance through 2 different taxes.

A yes vote would be just plain stuck on stupid.

Reply

Leave a comment